Available 24X7 
(281) 587-1111
(281) 587-1111 (281) 587-1111 
October 24, 2024 by Greg Baumgartner
Proximate cause is a fundamental concept in personal injury law, directly influencing the outcome of a claim. Establishing proximate cause is essential for a plaintiff seeking compensation. It connects the defendant’s conduct to the plaintiff’s injury, proving that the injury would not have occurred ‘but for’ the defendant’s actions. Below, we will detail how proximate cause works in personal injury cases, highlighting its importance through specific examples.
Proximate cause refers to the legal cause of an injury, meaning that it is not merely the actual cause but one that is closely connected to the harm. It must be foreseeable—meaning that a reasonable person could anticipate that their conduct could likely cause harm. Proximate cause ensures that defendants are only held responsible for injuries that directly result from their negligence or actions, aligning liability with fairness in the legal process.
To win a personal injury case, it’s not enough to show that the defendant acted negligently; the plaintiff must also prove that this negligence was the proximate cause of their injury. Without establishing this connection, even clear negligence may not result in liability. Proximate cause filters out cases where injuries are too indirectly related to the negligent act, preventing a defendant from being unfairly held responsible for unpredictable consequences.
Imagine a driver running a red light and colliding with another vehicle. If a pedestrian on the sidewalk is injured by debris from this accident, the driver’s action (running the red light) is the proximate cause of the pedestrian’s injuries. The injury was a foreseeable consequence of the driver’s reckless behavior.
In a retail store, a spilled liquid remains on the floor without any warning sign, and a customer slips, breaking their arm. The proximate cause here is the store’s failure to maintain safe conditions. The injury is a foreseeable consequence of leaving a hazard unattended.
A bar continues to serve an intoxicated customer. The customer is so drunk they can’t safely drive and crashes, injuring another driver. The accident was foreseeable that someone highly intoxicated may cause a serious accident. The bar might be held accountable for its overserving of the drunk driver.
A manufacturer releases a faulty product, like a toaster, that catches fire during normal use. If the toaster starts a fire, injuring the homeowner, the defect in the product is the proximate cause of the injury. The injury was foreseeable since the defect made the product dangerous.
A dog owner fails to leash their aggressive dog, which then attacks a passerby. The owner’s failure to control the dog is the proximate cause of the attack. The incident was foreseeable, given the dog’s aggressive nature and lack of restraint.
Proving proximate cause in a personal injury case involves demonstrating two key elements:
Cause-in-Fact– Also known as “but-for” causation, it asks whether the injury would not have occurred ‘but for’ the defendant’s actions. If the injury would have happened regardless, the proximate cause could not have been established.
Foreseeability– The injury must be a foreseeable result of the defendant’s conduct. If an injury is deemed too remote or unpredictable, proximate cause is not established.
Courts typically use the ‘reasonable person‘ standard to determine foreseeability, evaluating whether an average person could have anticipated the injury resulting from their actions.
An intervening cause is an event that occurs after the defendant’s negligent act, contributing to the injury. If the intervening event is unforeseeable, it can break the chain of causation, relieving the defendant of liability. However, if the intervening event is foreseeable, proximate cause may still be established.
In cases where the plaintiff is partly responsible for their injuries, comparative fault rules apply in Texas. Courts assess the degree of fault attributed to the plaintiff and the defendant. While proximate cause must still be shown, the amount of compensation may be reduced based on the plaintiff’s percentage of fault.
When multiple defendants are involved, courts determine whether each defendant’s actions contributed to the proximate cause of the injury. Joint and several liability may apply, allowing the plaintiff to recover full damages from any defendant found to be a proximate cause, even if other contributing factors exist.
Establishing proximate cause can be complex. Defendants often argue that the injury was either unforeseeable or caused by an intervening factor. Common challenges include:
Disputing Foreseeability- Defendants may claim that the plaintiff’s injury was not a predictable outcome of their actions, arguing that the harm was too remote or coincidental.
Introducing Alternative Causes- Defendants might suggest that other factors, such as the plaintiff’s own actions or a third party’s conduct, were the true cause of the injury, breaking the chain of proximate cause.
Addressing Contributory Negligence- If the plaintiff’s actions contributed to their injury, defense lawyers may argue that proximate cause cannot be solely attributed to the defendant.
Expert testimony is often crucial in personal injury cases involving complex causation. Experts can help establish the link between the defendant’s actions and the injury by providing detailed analysis. For example, in construction accident cases, OSHA experts may testify to demonstrate how a contractor’s negligence led to an injury accident.
Proximate cause is a critical element in personal injury law, ensuring fairness in assigning liability. It establishes the necessary connection between the defendant’s conduct and the plaintiff’s harm. Understanding and effectively demonstrating proximate cause is crucial to winning a personal injury claim, securing the compensation needed for recovery, and holding negligent parties liable.
If you have been hurt in an accident in Houston, TX, and need legal representatio,n contact our Houston personal injury lawyers to schedule your free consultation.
6711 Cypress Creek Pkwy,
Houston, TX, 77069
Greg Baumgartner is a preeminent rated personal injury lawyer based in Houston, Texas, with over three decades of experience representing severely injured clients in truck accidents. He founded Baumgartner Law Firm, in 1985, with a mission to provide excellent legal representa-tion and personalized attention to every client.
NEED HELP? HAVE QUESTIONS?
