After a crash, the other driver may say, “I just did not see you.” That does not answer why. Was the driver reading a text, looking at a navigation screen, reaching for something, or simply not paying attention?
Greg Baumgartner’s first concern in a suspected distracted-driving case is proof. A phone in the car is not enough. We need evidence showing what the driver was doing, when it happened, and how it contributed to the collision.
Texting is only one form of distraction. A driver may be looking at a map, selecting music, watching a screen, talking with passengers, eating, or reaching for an object. Some tasks take the driver’s eyes off the road; others take hands off the wheel or attention away from driving.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s distracted-driving guide explains the different ways attention can shift from the road.
A witness may have seen the driver looking down. Dashcam footage may show no braking before impact. The driver may have made a statement at the scene or given an account that changes later. Those details can point investigators toward the right records.
Depending on the facts and what is legally available, phone records, app activity, messages, vehicle systems, and electronic discovery may help establish a timeline. Records do not always reveal exactly what was on a screen, and obtaining private material can require tailored discovery or legal process. It is important not to promise that every text or app action can be recovered.
Vehicle damage, braking evidence, road conditions, video, and witness accounts help answer the next question: did the distraction make a difference? A phone record alone does not prove that phone use caused a wreck.
For a collision caused by someone drifting into opposing traffic, our head-on crash investigation guide explains the separate evidence issues. If the crash occurred at a traffic signal, see the discussion of disputed intersection crashes.
Nearby video can be overwritten. Vehicles may be repaired. Witnesses may become hard to locate. The driver’s explanation may also be clearer when recorded near the time of the wreck.
Greg’s advice is to save your own records first: photos, dashcam files, the crash report number, names of witnesses, and any messages from the other driver. Do not try to access someone else’s device or accounts. Proper legal requests are the way to seek evidence held by another person or business.
Texas restricts electronic communications while driving under specified circumstances, with exceptions. Other rules require drivers to control speed and make lane changes safely. The exact statute, current exceptions, driver conduct, and location matter. See Texas Transportation Code Chapter 545.
A ticket is not required for a civil injury claim, and a citation does not replace proof of negligence or causation. We examine what the driver did and whether it caused the harm.
Some collisions cause more than a short period of soreness. Brain injuries, spinal injuries, fractures, and time away from work may require medical records, specialist opinions, and evidence of future needs. Our Houston brain injury practice addresses one of the injuries that may follow a severe impact.
We do not assign a dollar value just because a driver was using a phone. Liability, medical evidence, insurance coverage, and long-term effects all matter.
Baumgartner Law Firm has handled serious injury claims since 1985. Greg stays personally involved in the cases the firm accepts. We would rather show an insurer the proof of distraction than rely on an angry accusation the evidence cannot support.
For the broader process of pursuing an injury claim, see the firm’s Houston auto collision practice. If you suspect a distracted driver caused your injuries, call (281) 587-1111 for a free case review. No attorney fee is owed unless we recover money.
Sometimes. Video, witnesses, admissions, and records obtained through proper legal processes may help. The available proof differs in every case.
Not necessarily. A report may identify suspected distraction, but the conclusion should be checked against the underlying evidence.
Navigation use does not automatically establish negligence. The question is whether the driver failed to use reasonable care and whether that failure contributed to the crash.
Learn more from our Houston car accident lawyer about the types of crashes we handle and what to do after a car wreck.
"*" indicates required fields
6711 Cypress Creek Pkwy, Houston, TX, 77069
(281) 587-1111
"*" indicates required fields