By Greg Baumgartner, founder of Baumgartner Law Firm | Updated September 28, 2026
If a drunk driver seriously injured you or killed someone you love in Houston, the civil case may involve much more than the driver’s auto insurance. I look at how the crash happened, where the driver had been drinking, whether another person or business may share responsibility, and every insurance policy that could apply.
I’m Greg Baumgartner. I founded Baumgartner Law Firm in 1985 and have represented injured people and families in Houston for more than 40 years. I represent crash victims—not people charged with DWI. Our drunk-driving cases have included a $6 million fatal-crash settlement, a $5 million brain-injury settlement, and a $625,000 recovery in a case where the driver was never arrested and no alcohol test was performed.
These cases reward early investigation. Bar video can be overwritten, receipts can disappear, and witnesses’ memories fade. The sooner we investigate, the better our chance of preserving evidence that may never appear in the police report.
Call (281) 587-1111 for a free consultation, or contact Baumgartner Law Firm online. There is no attorney’s fee unless we recover compensation for you.
Result | What happened |
$6 million | Fatal drunk-driving crash. The case settled for policy limits before trial. |
$5 million | Traumatic brain injury after a drunk driver rear-ended our client. The case settled during trial, immediately before the punitive-damages phase. |
$1 million | Policy-limits recovery against a bar after a fatal alcohol-related crash. |
$625,000 | Husband and wife injured as passengers of a drinking driver. The driver was never arrested, and no alcohol test was performed. |
$80,000 | Passenger injury claim involving about $2,282 in medical expenses. |
Every case is different. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
One mistake I see is assuming the police investigation will give an injured person everything needed for a civil case. It may not. Police officers are investigating a possible crime. I am investigating the civil case: who may be legally and financially responsible, what insurance is available, and what evidence will be needed to prove the client’s losses.
Insight from Greg Baumgartner: One of my first questions in a serious DWI case is not just whether the driver was intoxicated. I want to know where the driver was during the hours before the crash. That can lead us to video, bartenders, receipts, card records, witnesses, and sometimes another insurance policy.
Depending on the facts, we may:
The goal is not simply to prove that the other driver had been drinking. It is to build the strongest civil case the facts support and identify every legitimate source of recovery.
In a routine car accident claim, the main questions may be who caused the crash, how badly someone was hurt, and how much insurance is available. A drunk-driving case often requires us to go further.
Where was the driver before the crash? Who bought the drinks? Was the driver being served after obvious signs of intoxication? Was the driver working? Did someone knowingly entrust a vehicle to a driver who was not safe to drive? The answers can change the case because they may identify another responsible party or another insurance policy.
The police report usually does not answer all of those questions. Some of the most useful evidence may be on a business’s surveillance system, in a card statement, in a 911 recording, or in the testimony of someone who saw the driver before the crash.
The intoxicated driver may be responsible for medical expenses, lost income, pain, mental anguish, impairment, disfigurement, property damage, and other losses caused by the crash. In an appropriate case, exemplary damages may also be available.
Texas’s Dram Shop Act can create a claim against an alcohol provider when, at the time alcohol was sold or served, it was apparent that the customer was obviously intoxicated to the point of presenting a clear danger to himself or others, and that intoxication was a proximate cause of the injuries. The statute is Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code § 2.02.
That is not the same as proving the customer was drunk at the time of the crash. The important question is what the provider could see when the alcohol was being served. That is why video, bar tabs, payment records, server names, work schedules, and witness accounts matter.
Texas law also creates a narrower claim when an adult age 21 or older knowingly provides alcohol to a minor under 18, or allows the minor to be served on premises the adult owns or leases, subject to the exceptions and requirements in Section 2.02. Social-host cases are fact-specific.
If the driver was acting in the course and scope of employment, an employer may be responsible under the facts of the case. A vehicle owner may also face a negligent-entrustment claim when the evidence shows the owner entrusted the vehicle to someone the owner knew or should have known was an incompetent or reckless driver. Intoxication may be part of that evidence, depending on what the owner knew.
You may seek compensation for medical care, lost income, and the ways the crash changed your daily life. The losses must result from the crash and be supported by evidence. Serious injuries can affect your health, work, and independence for years.
When I review a drunk-driving case, I want to understand what you could do before the crash and what has become harder since. Medical records tell part of that story. Your work duties, family responsibilities, and treatment needs help explain the rest.
Loss | What it covers | Evidence that helps |
Medical expenses | Reasonable, necessary care already received for crash injuries. | Medical records, bills, and payment records. |
Future medical care | Treatment, therapy, equipment, or assistance you will likely need. | Doctors’ opinions, cost estimates, and a life-care plan when needed. |
Lost wages | Income lost while injuries kept you from working. | Pay records, employer statements, and missed-work dates. |
Reduced earning capacity | Reduced ability to earn a living, now or in the future. | Job demands, work restrictions, and expert analysis when needed. |
Pain and mental anguish | Physical suffering and serious emotional distress caused by the injuries. | Treatment records and specific accounts of symptoms and their effects. |
Physical impairment | Limits on daily activities beyond lost earnings and pain alone. | Examples of activities you can no longer do, supported by records and witnesses. |
Disfigurement | Scars or other lasting changes to your appearance. | Photographs, medical records, and evidence of the lasting effects. |
Returning to work does not always mean full recovery. You may still need therapy, work fewer hours, or struggle with tasks that once came easily. We document those limits and keep the proof for each loss distinct so the claim does not count the same harm twice.
Vehicle damage may also be part of the claim. When a crash causes a death, eligible family members and the estate may have separate claims, discussed in the wrongful-death section below.
There is no reliable average settlement that tells you what your case is worth. I assess your losses, the liability evidence, any shared-fault allegations, and the insurance or assets available. Exemplary damages require separate proof and are discussed next.
You may still have options if the drunk driver is uninsured or has too little coverage for your injuries. Your own coverage, a policy on the vehicle the driver used, or a claim against another responsible party may provide additional sources of payment.
I review the available policies and the facts that could support additional claims before advising you about settlement. An insurance limit helps explain what one policy may pay; it does not measure the full impact of your injuries.
Possible source | What we check |
UM/UIM coverage | Uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage may apply through your policy, a household policy, or the vehicle you occupied. Insured status and policy terms matter. |
The vehicle owner’s policy | Coverage on a borrowed vehicle may apply, depending on permission, covered drivers, and exclusions. Coverage and the owner’s legal responsibility are separate questions. |
A business’s liability coverage | An employer’s commercial policy or an alcohol provider’s liability policy may apply when the facts support a claim against that business. |
Umbrella or excess coverage | Additional coverage above a primary policy may exist, subject to its terms, limits, and exclusions. |
PIP or medical payments coverage, if available, may also help with covered medical expenses. PIP may cover some lost income. These benefits have their own limits and do not replace a full review of the injury claim.
Before recommending a lawsuit, I consider available insurance and collectible assets. A judgment alone does not guarantee payment. I also review proposed settlement releases because their terms can affect remaining claims and coverage.
For a plain-language explanation of these auto coverages, see the Texas Department of Insurance’s auto insurance guide.
You may still have a strong civil case. A criminal DWI prosecution and a personal-injury lawsuit use different standards and serve different purposes. Your injury claim does not disappear because an officer did not arrest the driver or because prosecutors did not obtain a conviction.
Civil proof can come from witnesses, 911 calls, body-camera video, medical records, toxicology evidence, receipts, social-media posts, or the driver’s own statements. In one of our cases, we recovered $625,000 for two passengers even though the driver was never arrested and no alcohol test was performed.
Texas defines intoxication in Penal Code § 49.01.
Passengers can bring injury claims too. The insurance company may argue that a passenger knew or should have known the driver was impaired, but that does not automatically end the case. The facts matter, including what the passenger knew, when the drinking occurred, and whether there were reasonable alternatives.
Most Texas personal-injury lawsuits must be filed within two years of the injury under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 16.003. Wrongful-death claims generally also have a two-year limitations period, subject to exceptions that can affect the calculation.
Two years can sound like plenty of time. It is not a safe investigation schedule. Video can be overwritten, business records can become harder to obtain, and witnesses can disappear long before a lawsuit is due. If a bar or restaurant may be involved, early preservation work can be critical.
A fatal drunk-driving crash leaves a family dealing with grief while insurance companies, medical bills, funeral expenses, and lost income continue to move forward. No civil case fixes that loss, but it can hold responsible parties accountable and protect the family’s financial future.
Under Texas law, the surviving spouse, children, and parents may bring a wrongful-death claim in qualifying cases. The estate may also have a separate survival claim for damages the person suffered between the injury and death. See Chapter 71 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
Our firm obtained a $6 million settlement for a family after a fatal drunk-driving crash. Learn more from our Houston wrongful death lawyer page.
Impaired drivers may react late, fail to brake, cross lanes, or drive at unsafe speeds. Serious crashes can cause brain injuries, spinal injuries, fractures, internal injuries, burns, scarring, and permanent impairment.
For life-changing injuries, the claim must account for more than today’s bills. Future medical care, lost earning capacity, and the effect on daily life can become major parts of the case.
TxDOT’s 2025 statistics show that alcohol-related crashes remain a serious problem in Harris County. TxDOT reports 3,090 DUI-alcohol crashes in the county, including 138 deaths and 224 suspected serious injuries.
Those numbers come from TxDOT’s 2025 motor vehicle crash statistics. TxDOT uses “DUI (Alcohol)” as a reporting label; Texas criminal law generally uses DWI for an adult accused of driving while intoxicated.
I do not view those figures as abstract statistics. Each one represents someone suddenly facing medical treatment, missed work, insurance problems, or the death of a family member. When we investigate a serious crash on I-45, I-10, US 290, Beltway 8, FM 1960, or another Houston road, we work backward from the collision and look for evidence that explains both the crash and the driver’s drinking.
I founded Baumgartner Law Firm in 1985. I have spent my career representing injured people and families—not insurance companies. I hold both a J.D. and an LL.M., am a graduate of the Trial Lawyers College, and have held an AV Preeminent peer rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
I also keep the firm’s caseload intentionally small. That lets me remain personally involved in the cases we accept. Serious drunk-driving cases can require quick decisions about evidence, experts, defendants, insurance, and litigation. I prepare those cases with trial in mind rather than assuming they will settle.
The consultation is free. We handle accepted injury cases on a contingency fee, so you do not pay an attorney’s fee unless we recover compensation for you. Our fees range from 33.33% to 40% when litigation is required. The fee and case-expense terms are explained in the written agreement before representation begins.
"*" indicates required fields
If a drunk driver seriously injured you or killed someone you love in Houston, Harris County, or Southeast Texas, I am willing to listen to what happened and explain the civil options I see. The sooner we can look at a serious case, the better chance we have to preserve evidence that may matter later.
Call Baumgartner Law Firm at (281) 587-1111 or request a free consultation online. There is no attorney’s fee unless we recover compensation for you.
Yes. If a drunk driver’s negligence injured you, you may bring a civil claim for the losses caused by the crash. The civil case is separate from any criminal DWI prosecution.
Yes. An arrest or conviction is not required to bring a civil injury claim. Witnesses, video, 911 recordings, toxicology, receipts, and other evidence can help prove the case.
Sometimes. Texas law requires proof about the customer’s condition when alcohol was sold or served and proof that the intoxication was a proximate cause of the injury.
Possibly. Texas allows exemplary damages when the evidence meets Chapter 41’s requirements. The facts must support the higher legal standard that applies to exemplary damages.
Other sources may still exist, including your own UM/UIM coverage, a dram-shop claim, an employer’s policy, the vehicle owner’s coverage, or umbrella insurance. The facts and policies must be reviewed.
There is no reliable average. Case value depends on the injuries, future losses, liability evidence, available insurance, and the facts supporting exemplary damages or additional defendants.
Most Texas personal-injury claims have a two-year statute of limitations, subject to exceptions. Evidence can disappear much sooner, so the practical deadline to investigate may be far earlier.
Baumgartner Law Firm offers a free consultation and handles accepted injury cases on a contingency fee. You do not pay an attorney’s fee unless the firm recovers compensation for you.
"*" indicates required fields
We will respond as soon as possible. For immediate help, call us directly at (281) 587-1111.